Jihad A Mustapha, MD1; Fadi Saab, MD1; Larry J Diaz-Sandoval, MD1; Robert Beasley, MD2;
Theresa N. McGoff, BA, BSN, RN1; Sara Finton, BSN, RN1; Carmen Heaney, BSN, RN1; George Adams, MD3
From 1Metro Health Hospital Wyoming, Michigan; 2Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami, Florida;
and 3University of North Carolina REX Healthcare
ABSTRACT: Purpose. Subjects with critical limb ischemia (CLI) have high 1-year amputation and mortality rates. PRIME is an ongoing prospective, observational clinical registry that documents the clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, endovascular treatment modalities, invasive and non-invasive follow-up, and long-term outcomes of these subjects. The clinical profile and outcomes of CLI subjects were characterized and compared with previous literature to highlight the contemporary knowledge, treatment standards, and challenges in CLI care. Methods. Data were analyzed from the first 328 CLI subjects enrolled in the PRIME registry. Baseline demographics, medical history, clinical presentation, testing, treatment modalities, and immediate, 30-day, and 12-month outcomes were evaluated. Results. From January 2013 to March 2016, a total of 328 subjects with CLI (Rutherford 4-6) were enrolled. Most subjects were non-Hispanic white males, with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and smoking history, with a mean age of 70.3 years, covered by Medicare. The most common symptoms were claudication, rest pain, and non-healing ulcers. In all, 481 target lesions were treated (average 1.5/procedure). Mean target-lesion prestenosis was 92.7% and over one-half were chronic total occlusions. Balloon angioplasty with atherectomy was the most common treatment, followed by balloon angioplasty alone. Amputation-free survival at 12 months was 84%. Conclusion. The study of more patients and a longer follow-up will allow us to derive further knowledge on the endovascular treatment of complex CLI subjects.
VASCULAR DISEASE MANAGEMENT 2017;14(3):E55-E66
Key words: critical limb ischemia, peripheral artery disease, endovascular treatment/therapy, peripheral vascular disease, revascularization, registry
Critical limb ischemia (CLI) represents the terminal stage of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and occurs when the capillary beds are inadequately perfused and unable to sustain tissue viability. It is defined by the presence of rest pain and/or tissue loss for at least 2 to 4 weeks that can be attributed to occlusive arterial disease. The diagnosis is clinical in nature and classified as Fontaine stages III and IV or Rutherford-Becker classification 4, 5, and 6. The European Consensus Conference has also included the need for analgesia for more than 2 weeks or ischemic tissue loss with an ankle pressure of <50 mm Hg.1
Anatomically, CLI is characterized by multilevel and multivessel infrainguinal and tibial-pedal arterial stenoses and occlusions that create a severe imbalance between supply and demand of oxygen in the affected tissues, compromising their viability and threatening limb loss. It is estimated that 1.5 million patients in Europe and 2 million in the United States over age 50 manifest symptoms of CLI. One-year mortality and major amputation rates range from 20%-50%.2-4 It occurs in approximately 1%-3% of all PAD cases,5-7 with an incidence between 500-1000 persons per million per year in Europe and the United States.8-10
CLI patients have a multitude of comorbidities, significantly increasing their risk for myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, limb loss, and death.11,12 Within the first year of diagnosis, 25% of patients will die and 30% will be alive but amputated. Two years post below-the-knee (BTK) amputation, 15% will undergo above-the-knee (ATK) amputation and 30% will die.12 The quality of life of the surviving CLI patient is significantly worse than that of patients with cancer, chronic heart disease, and chronic kidney disease.13
In a study of 20,464 Medicare subjects with CLI who underwent amputations, 71% had no revascularization and 54% had no angiogram, underscoring the under-utilization of interventional procedures.5 Prospective randomized studies comparing endovascular revascularization with surgical bypass are in the works, but currently there is a paucity of randomized data comparing strategies.14 Since the BASIL trial found that endovascular therapy (EVT) paralleled amputation-free survival and quality of life at 6 months, and was less morbid and significantly more economic than surgery,15,16 there has been a widespread adoption of the “EVT-first” approach along with continuous innovations in endovascular techniques and devices.17
To further elucidate the most promising diagnostic and endovascular therapeutic modalities for advanced PAD and CLI, the multicenter, prospective, observational Peripheral RegIstry of endovascular clinical outcoMEs (PRIME) was initiated. PRIME collects comprehensive clinical, diagnostic, procedural, and follow-up data for 3 years following an index endovascular procedure for advanced PAD and CLI.
We present a descriptive analysis of the first 328 CLI subjects enrolled in PRIME, and compare their clinical profile, procedural, 30-day, and 12-month outcomes to the existing body of literature in an effort to highlight the existing limitations in CLI knowledge and care.
PRIME represents the collaborative effort among three endovascular, high-volume, research-focused CLI centers across the United States with the goal of reaching ten sites globally. Site participation is voluntary and sites were not reimbursed for participation.
CLI subjects at each center were identified through physician referral and review of admitting diagnoses. Eligible subjects were over the age of 18 years, with symptoms classified as Rutherford 4-6, who were scheduled to undergo EVT of a lower extremity, were willing and able to provide informed consent, and intended to keep their follow-up appointments at the enrolling site. Each site’s Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved the study and all subjects signed the informed consent form prior to participation. If all consecutive CLI subjects were not able to be approached at a site, an IRB-approved enrollment algorithm was followed to avoid selection bias. EVT approach and modality were left to the discretion of the treating physician and follow-up was performed per sites’ routine standards of care.
The medical records of subjects undergoing revascularization for CLI were the source of clinical information entered into PRIME. Information collected included: demographics (gender, age, race, ethnicity, and insurance type); medical history (angina, coronary artery disease [CAD], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], coronary artery bypass graft [CABG], diabetes, dialysis, dyslipidemia, hypertension, MI, tobacco use); previous vascular procedures; presenting symptoms (claudication, rest pain, non-healing wounds); clinical characteristics; medications; ankle-brachial index (ABI); toe-brachial index (TBI); endovascular procedural modalities and details; and immediate outcomes (complications and technical success prior to discharge).
Follow-up data were gathered at 30 days and at 3, 6, and 12 months, with ongoing collection at 24 and 36 months. Follow-up data included history (symptom status: improvement, deterioration, resolution; comorbidities and procedural complications) and physical examination, non-invasive and invasive imaging, and mortality.
Data were captured in a web-based, electronic data capture system (iMednet version 1.161.3; Mednet Solutions, Inc) and were collected using standardized variable definitions. Definitions relevant to this publication can be found in Appendix 1. Missing data were flagged for review by the dedicated site staff and remote data validation and monitoring occurred for all initial site submissions and at predetermined intervals.
Continuous variables are reported as mean ± standard deviation and range (min-max) depending on normality assumptions. Categorical variables are presented as numbers with percentages. Amputation-free survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier non-parametric statistical analysis.
From January 2013 to March 2016, a total of 328 CLI subjects consented and were enrolled in the PRIME registry. The subjects underwent 328 index endovascular revascularization procedures to treat 481 target lesions using combinations of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (balloon), stenting, and atherectomy (Figure 1). As of April 2016, all subjects (328) had reached their 30-day follow-up window and data were collected on 300 subjects (91.2%). By April 2016, a total of 240 of the 328 subjects had entered the 12-month follow-up window and data were able to be collected on 165 subjects (68.8%).
Demographics and Comorbidities
Mean patient age was 70.3 ± 11.7 years. Most subjects were white, non-Hispanic, male, and claimed Medicare as primary insurance payer. Over 50% of patients had type II diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. Approximately three-quarters of the subjects were current or former smokers. Many patients had been treated with endovascular or surgical treatment prior to their enrollment in PRIME (Table 1).
Presenting Symptoms and Laboratory Values
The most common presenting symptom was presence of an ulcer, with the majority of subjects enrolled as Rutherford classification 5 and 6. Mean baseline creatinine value was 1.5 mg/mL, glomerular filtration rate 61.4 mL/min, and hemoglobin was 12.5 g/dL. These values changed minimally at discharge. At enrollment, most subjects were taking an antihypertensive (beta-blocker, angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitor), and/or angiotensin-II receptor blocker (ARB) and statin medication. At least 75% of subjects were taking aspirin and over 50% were taking clopidogrel (Table 2).
Baseline Evaluation Modalities and Level of Disease
Diagnostic angiography was the primary imaging modality followed by ABI and duplex ultrasound. ABIs and TBIs were misleading, as most patients had values consistent with mild PAD. Level of disease (above the knee only, below the knee only, or multilevel) was determined through visual estimate during angiography, and hemodynamic significance was defined as ≥70% stenosis. The majority of CLI patients enrolled in PRIME had multilevel disease in the target limb (Table 3).
A target lesion is defined as any lesion attempted to be crossed or treated during the index endovascular procedure. Data on 481 target lesions were collected from the index endovascular interventions, averaging 1.5 lesions treated per procedure. Mean target-lesion stenosis was 92.3% and over one-half were chronic total occlusions (CTOs). About 25% of the subjects’ target lesions had been previously intervened upon and about 40% required multiple (staged) procedures to provide adequate perfusion (Table 4).
Average time from successful access into the artery (percutaneous stick) to sheath pull was about 93 min. Arterial access was most commonly attempted in the common femoral artery followed by the tibiopedal arteries. Balloon angioplasty (plain, scoring, cutting, or drug coated) used in conjunction with atherectomy (orbital, directional, rotational, or laser) was the most commonly used treatment modality. In <5% of the procedures, no devices were utilized due to the inability to cross the target lesion. (Table 5).
Outcomes Post Endovascular Procedure
Immediate outcomes data include information from the index endovascular procedures to discharge from the hospital. As of April 2016, 30-day follow-up data were collected on 300 subjects (91.2%) and 12-month follow-up data were available on 165 subjects (68.8% of the subjects who have reached 12-month follow-up status) (Table 6). Amputation-free survival (AFS) was based on the patients who returned or were contacted for each follow-up window and can be seen in Figure 2. Based on these results, 12-month major AFS was predicted by Kaplan-Meier to be 84%, while major and minor AFS rate was determined to be 75%.
The PRIME registry was launched with the goal of collecting data on 5000 subjects with advanced PAD and CLI. To date, over 300 subjects with CLI (Rutherford 4 [39.2%], Rutherford 5 [55.3%], and Rutherford 6 [5.5%]) have been enrolled at three high-volume academic and community-based centers in the United States.
Of the first 328 subjects, 64% were male, with a mean age of 70.3 years (range, 35.5-93.1 years). This demographic information correlates with previous literature showing that advanced PAD and CLI are more frequently seen in men and are age related, with increased incidence among subjects 65 years and older.18 The majority of these subjects (80.2%) had Medicare coverage.
Previous literature has shown that the prevalence of PAD and CLI is higher among African-Americans.18 Interestingly, enrollment in the PRIME registry has thus far drawn subjects primarily from areas highly populated with white, non-Hispanic individuals. As an increased number of sites join in data collection, a less ethnically-biased cohort will become available, and a more in-depth conclusion about the prevalence of disease among different ethnicities will become available.19,20
The demographic features and cardiovascular risk factors of the subjects enrolled in PRIME corroborate with those previously published for PAD and CLI, which include CAD, diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and tobacco use.6 The prevalence of renal disease and dialysis was higher among the registry subjects in comparison to the general population. Average baseline creatinine was 1.5 mg/dL (0.3 mg/dL higher than most institutions’ upper limit of normal). The mean GFR would classify PRIME subjects as having stage 2-3 chronic kidney disease, and almost 7% of subjects are dialysis dependent, compared with 348 subjects per million in the United States (United States Renal Data system, 2010). Therefore, the PRIME population represents a cohort with an even higher than usual risk for contrast-induced nephropathy and hence mortality, as established by Abe et al.21 Medical therapy specific to CLI revolves around the treatment of the myriad of comorbidities with which these subjects typically present. Suboptimal medical therapy was identified in the registry, with only 76.8% of subjects taking aspirin and 71% taking statins at presentation.
Most subjects (>90%) underwent diagnostic angiography prior to their endovascular procedure, showing that a large percentage of CLI subjects (45.2%) have multilevel disease, in agreement with the SCAI Expert Consensus Statement for Infrapopliteal Arterial Intervention Appropriate Use.22 Over one-half of the lesions were CTOs and almost 90% were calcific, making their treatment more complex. The average number of target lesions treated per procedure was 1.5. The number of staged procedures needed to complete revascularization will be important to research, as each additional procedure leads to added cost and risk to patients. Baseline ABI values were available for 61.8% of patients and the mean values were consistent with mild PAD, as described by Bunte et al.23 Additional analysis with larger numbers of CLI patients may need to be completed to further analyze the validity of hemodynamic parameters in the characterization and evaluation of patients with CLI.
The wide range of revascularization techniques utilized also underscores the complexity of CLI, as different anatomical locations may require different revascularization techniques. In the BASIL trial, the EVT was primarily focused on plain balloon angioplasty, while the Japanese OLIVE registry mainly featured plain balloon angioplasty, cutting balloon angioplasty, and/or nitinol stenting (for bail-out). As PRIME is not dictating the treatment modalities to be used, it shows an evolution of therapy that is different from these previous registries. Further research into these data may help us understand where different modalities excel and fail. Analyses of the short-term and long-term outcomes of these subjects may steer operators in different directions when making decisions on revascularization in subjects with CLI.
Vascular access location and number is yet another evolving topic, as CLI subjects frequently require multiple access points (mean of 1.4 access points and up to 4 access points during the same procedure, with a significant number of tibiopedal retrograde accesses). From the PRIME-CLI data, it appears that access complications are few and far between as overall complications rates were all under 5%, but no consensus exists regarding the safest and most effective access method.24 Further study into the safety and feasibility of using different access techniques and sites should be implemented.
As the number of enrolled subjects increases, a better understanding of which patients would not be able to withstand such procedures may become evident. Immediate complications related to EVT in the PRIME population appears to be low, under 5% for all categories except dissection (12.5%). This suggests an achievement of the short-term goal of anatomical revascularization without significant compromise to the subject.
The prognosis of CLI remains extremely poor. Mortality rates in contemporary CLI series have been reported as high as 41% at 2 years25 and the 30-day morbidity and mortality related to a major amputation ranges from 4%-12% depending on the level of amputation.26 The overall mortality rates at 30 days and 12 months for the PRIME subjects were 1.2% and 13.6%, respectively. For the patients who reached 12-month follow-up, the major amputation rate was reported at 8.5%, whereas the minor amputation rate was 14.5%.
The PRIME registry major AFS rates at 3, 6, and 12 months trend higher than those presented by the OLIVE registry (Figure 2). Overall 12-month major AFS was 84% in PRIME, 74% in OLIVE, and 71% in the retrospective cohorts of the PREVENT III, BASIL, and CIRCULASE trials.27,28 The difference in AFS is most likely due to improved awareness and increasingly available technologies in the United States. The improvement in the AFS in PRIME is a good indicator that current EVT is effective in treating complex CLI patients, but further analysis is warranted.
Although 30-day follow-up compliance was 91.2%, 12-month compliance was only 68.8%. Patients who did not return for follow-up were contacted via telephone to determine survival and amputation data, with only 7 patients lost to follow-up. Limited data exist regarding long-term follow-up of this complex patient population and lack of compliance may be a predictor of poorer outcomes. Future analysis regarding the outcomes of the patients who return for follow-up vs those who do not is warranted.
Important concomitant PAD registries exist; however, none are exclusively devoted to the study of EVTs among subjects with advanced PAD and CLI for 3 consecutive years. BMC2 is focused on both coronary and peripheral interventions, and follows subjects for only 6 months. The ACC-PVI registry includes all patients with PAD, as well as patients undergoing carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy. VQI encompasses a large surgical focus including carotid stenting, endarterectomy, abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, bypass, endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), and PVI. XLPAD includes PAD patients of all Rutherford categories and follows for 12 months. LIBERTY 360 includes Rutherford 2-6 PAD subjects, but does not include patients being treated for in-stent restenosis, and data collection is capped at 1200 patients. The OLIVE registry focused solely on 314 Japanese CLI patients.27
Data were collected prospectively and all requested information was not always available. Data were included as appropriate for descriptive analysis. In addition, invasive and non-invasive imaging was analyzed and reported; however, adjudication is not currently built into the protocol. For future inquiries, alternate solutions will be implemented.
As previously discussed, a race and ethnicity bias is present as the data are currently mostly based on white, non-Hispanic individuals. Referral bias may also be present, as subjects with symptomatic advanced PAD and CLI may be more likely to be assessed at one of the participating institutions. Asymptomatic or undiagnosed subjects have not been included and may have different characteristics from symptomatic subjects. Not including undiagnosed subjects also limits the ability to determine the true prevalence of CLI. Lack of 12-month follow-up may also limit the amount of information able to be extracted. For future publications, phone follow-up may be implemented for subjects unable to return to the institution.
As the registry matures, more centers will be activated and a larger number of subjects will be enrolled. This change will reduce bias and make findings more generalizable.
Analysis of the first 328 patients confirms previously published data on demographics, showing that CLI most frequently affects white males who are Medicare beneficiaries. Our interim analysis also confirms the limitations that currently accepted non-invasive modalities have in the accurate identification of CLI patients. Improved AFS rates may point to increased awareness and earlier detection of CLI, with more aggressive treatment that incorporate adjuvant therapies beside balloon angioplasty. The study of more patients and a longer follow-up will allow us to derive further knowledge on the diagnostic and therapeutic tools used to treat complex CLI subjects.
Funding: Data were obtained from patients enrolled in The Peripheral RegIstry of Endovascular Clinical OutcoMEs (PRIME Registry). This registry is supported, in part, by unrestricted research grants from Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc; Terumo Interventional Systems Corporation; Cardiovascular Systems, Inc; Access Closure, Inc; Medtronic; Boston Scientific Corporation; and Spectranetics Corporation.
Disclosures: The authors have completed and returned the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Dr Mustapha reports consultancy to Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc, Terumo Interventional Systems Corporation, Cardiovascular Systems, Inc, Medtronic, Boston Scientific Corporation, and Spectranetics Corporation. Dr Diaz-Sandoval reports consultancy to Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc, Terumo Interventional Systems Corporation, Cardiovascular Systems, Inc, and Spectranetics Corporation. Dr Adams reports consultancy to Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc, Terumo Interventional Systems Corporation, Cardiovascular Systems, Inc, Medtronic, Boston Scientific Corporation, and Spectranetics Corporation. Dr Beasley reports consultancy to Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc, Cardiovascular Systems, Inc, Medtronic, Boston Scientific Corporation, and Spectranetics Corporation. Dr Saab reports consultancy to Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc, Terumo Interventional Systems Corporation, Cardiovascular Systems, Inc, Medtronic, Boston Scientific Corporation, and Spectranetics Corporation. T.N. McGoff, S. Finton, and C. Heaney report no disclosures regarding the content herein.
Manuscript submitted January 9, 2017, final version accepted on January 30, 2017.
Address for correspondence: Jihad A Mustapha, Metro Health University of Michigan Health, 5900 Byron Center Ave SW, Wyoming, MI 49519. Email: email@example.com
- Second European Consensus Document on chronic critical leg ischemia. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1992;6(Suppl A):1-32.
- Bosiers M, Scheinert D, Peeters P, et al. Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting versus bare-metal stents in patients with critical limb ischemia and infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55:390-398.
- Balzer JO, Zeller T, Rastan A, et al. Percutaneous interventions below the knee in patients with critical limb ischemia using drug eluting stents. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2010;51:183-191.
- Siablis D, Karnabatidis D, Katsanos K, et al. Infrapopliteal application of paclitaxel-eluting stents for critical limb ischemia: midterm angiographic and clinical results. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007;18:1351-1361.
- Lambert MA, Belch JJ. Medical management of critical limb ischaemia: where do we stand today? J Intern Med. 2013;274:295-307.
- Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, et al. ACC/AHA 2005 guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): executive summary a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease) endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; and Vascular Disease Foundation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1239-1312.
- Gottsater A. Managing risk factors for atherosclerosis in critical limb ischaemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006;32:478-483.
- Norgren L. Pharmacotherapy for critical limb ischaemia. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2000;16(Suppl 1):S37-S41.
- Second European consensus document on chronic critical leg ischemia. Circulation. 1991;84(4 Suppl):IV1-IV26.
- Misra S, Lookstein R, Rundback J, et al. Proceedings from the Society of Interventional Radiology research consensus panel on critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24:451-458.
- Lumsden AB, Davies MG, Peden EK. Medical and endovascular management of critical limb ischemia. J Endovasc Ther. 2009;16(2 Suppl 2):II31-II62.
- Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, et al. Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;33(Suppl 1):S1-S75.
- Sprengers RW, Teraa M, Moll FL, et al. Quality of life in patients with no-option critical limb ischemia underlines the need for new effective treatment. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52:843-849, 849.e1.
- Conte MS. Bypass versus angioplasty in severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL) and the (hoped for) dawn of evidence-based treatment for advanced limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51(5 Suppl):69S-75S.
- Barshes NR, Chambers JD, Cohen J, et al. Model To optimize healthcare value in ischemic extremities 1 study C. Cost-effectiveness in the contemporary management of critical limb ischemia with tissue loss. J Vasc Surg. 2012;56:1015.e1-1024.e1.
- Adam DJ, Beard JD, Cleveland T, et al. Bypass versus angioplasty in severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366:1925-1934.
- Jaff MR, White CJ, Hiatt WR, et al; TASC Steering Committee. An update on methods for revascularization and expansion of the TASC lesion classification to include below-the-knee arteries: a supplement to the Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II). J Endovasc Ther. 2015;22:663-677.
- Criqui MH, Aboyans V. Epidemiology of peripheral artery disease. Circ Res. 2015;116:1509-1526.
- Goodney PP, Travis LL, Nallamothu BK, et al. Variation in the use of lower extremity vascular procedures for critical limb ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5:94-102.
- Vogel TR, Dombrovskiy VY, Carson JL, et al. In-hospital and 30-day outcomes after tibioperoneal interventions in the US Medicare population with critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:109-115.
- Abe M, Morimoto T, Akao M, et al. Relation of contrast-induced nephropathy to long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2014;114:362-368.
- Gray BH, Diaz-Sandoval LJ, Dieter RS, et al. SCAI expert consensus statement for infrapopliteal arterial intervention appropriate use. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;84:539-545.
- Bunte MC, Jacob J, Nudelman B, et al. Validation of the relationship between ankle-brachial and toe-brachial indices and infragenicular arterial patency in critical limb ischemia. Vasc Med. 2015;20:23-29.
- Sobolev M, Slovut DP, Lee Chang A, et al. Ultrasound-guided catheterization of the femoral artery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Invasive Cardiol. 2015;27:318-323.
- Soga Y, Iida O, Takahara M, et al. Two-year life expectancy in patients with critical limb ischemia. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:1444-1449.
- Hasanadka R, McLafferty RB, Moore CJ, et al. Predictors of wound complications following major amputation for critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:1374-1382.
- Iida O, Nakamura M, Yamauchi Y, et al. Endovascular treatment for infrainguinal vessels in patients with critical limb ischemia. OLIVE registry, a prospective, multicenter study in Japan with 12-month follow-up. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:68-76.
- Conte MS, Geraghty PJ, Bradbury AW, et al. Suggested objective performance goals and clinical trial design for evaluating catheter-based treatment of critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2009;50:1462-1473.e1-e3.